Contact Us

Use the form on the right to contact us.

You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right. 

Form Block
This form needs a storage option. Double-click here to edit this form, and tell us where to save form submissions in the Storage tab. Learn more

503-704-2376

Specializing in Vintage Fetish Publications, Erotica & Curiosa, Occult & Esoteric Studies, and more.

NEW ARRIVALS

[LORENZEN, David N.] The Kapalikas and Kalamukhas. Two Lost Saivite Sects

IMG_8256.jpeg
IMG_8257.jpeg
IMG_8258.jpeg
IMG_8256.jpeg
IMG_8257.jpeg
IMG_8258.jpeg

[LORENZEN, David N.] The Kapalikas and Kalamukhas. Two Lost Saivite Sects

$60.00

Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972. First US Edition. Hardcover in pictorial boards. 214pp. Black cloth with gilt spine titlea. Bibliography, index. Small black remainder mark to lower edge. Edge and corner wear to price-clipped dust jacket. A very good copy in a near very good dust jacket.

Add To Cart

This study attempts to give as complete as possible a description of two extinct Saivite sect -- the Kapalikas and the Kalamukhas. In a Christian context the concept of a 'sect' embodies three essential features: a specific doctrine (including a prescribed mode of worship), a priesthood, and a well-defined and exclusive laity. The structure of Hindu 'sects' is in general much more amorphous than that of Christian ones. In most cases more emphasis is placed on doctrine and mode of worship than on organisation. The Sanskrit words most often used for the Kapalika, Kalamukha and Pasupata 'sects' —the groups discussed in this study—are darsana, samaya and mata. The basic meaning of these words is 'doctrine.' Each of the three groups also had its own priesthood. That of the Kalamukhas appears to have been the best organised. Several Kalamukha monasteries (mathas), each under a single head (matha-pati), controlled temples in the regions surrounding them. It is doubtful, however, whether any of the three groups had its own exclusive laity. An ordinary farmer or merchant might have called himself a Buddhist, Jain, Vaisnava, or Saivite, but probably not a Kapalika, Kalamukha or Pasupata. Records indicate that persons supported priesthoods of different and even hostile 'sects' without feeling disloyal. For this reason it might be more appropriate to speak of Kalamukha, Pasupata and Kapalika 'monastic orders' rather than 'sects.' Since, however, the term 'monastic order' does not usually imply a separate doctrinal or philosophical position, we will remain content with the word 'sect.' Unfortunately no religious texts of either the Kapalikas or the Kalamukhas have survived. Their portraits must be drawn from accounts by their opponents and, in the case of the Kalamukhas, from the information contained in epigraphic grants to their temples. The comments on both sects by Yamunacarya and his famous pupil Ramanuja make the best starting point. Many of the remarks by these two Vaisnava sages about the Kapalikas are confirmed and enlarged by the numerous descriptions of Kapalika ascetics in Sanskrit literature.